Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Despite substantial scientific effort, the relationship between stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting and the use of the aortic no-touch off-pump technique (anOPCAB) remains incompletely understood. The present study aimed to define the effect of anOPCAB on the occurrence and time point of stroke. METHODS: A total cohort of 15,042 consecutive patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization at a single institution. After establishing anOPCAB as routine procedure, 4695 patients received surgery by 18 different surgeons using the anaortic approach. After the exclusion of all patients with cardiogenic shock and "side-clamp" off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 13,279 patients (4485 with anOPCAB) were included in the study. Perioperative strokes were classified as strokes occurring during the hospital stay, with early strokes observed immediately after emergence from anesthesia (vs delayed strokes). RESULTS: The anOPCAB technique reduced the postoperative stroke rate to 0.49% versus 1.31% in on-pump patients (P < .0001). The overall stroke rate after adoption of anOPCAB (0.64%) decreased compared with before its adoption (1.40%; P < .0001). With anOPCAB, the risk of early strokes virtually disappeared to 4 of 4485 patients (0.09%; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.18% vs 0.83% in on-pump patients; P < .0001), whereas the incidence of delayed strokes was not affected (0.40% vs 0.48%; P = .5181). The key results were confirmed after adjustment using propensity score-based analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The anOPCAB technique with avoidance of any aortic manipulation is an effective tool to minimize the risk of early strokes during coronary artery bypass grafting, and thus, should be considered as a routine approach. In contrast, additional preventive strategies against delayed strokes remain to be elaborated.

The history of the management of sternal osteomyelitis and mediastinitis - from Hippocrates until today.

Even during the time of Hippocrates, Galen and their colleagues recognized mediastinal affections. However, they were not considered with the surgical treatment. First progress in the treatment options of this severe disease, still denoted as 'terra incognita', over to today's gold standard are pictured. The mediastinitis-registry which was founded by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG) in 2011 and the recent establishment of the study group to adopt a guideline 'diagnosis and therapy of postoperative mediastinitis/sternal osteomyelitis following cardiac surgery' are attempts to a standardization of the treatment. Substantial advancement in the treatment of postoperative mediastinitis could be achieved in the past. The mortality dropped as low as less than 10%. With these implementations more benefit for the patients' outcome can be expected.

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: identification of high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study identifies high-risk octogenarians for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) because with the current advances in transcatheter valve therapy, a definition of patient selection criteria is essential. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 493 consecutive octogenarians with symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent AVR with and without (51%) concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To identify high-risk patient groups, risk factors of 6-month mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 8.4% and it increased up to 15.2% until 6 months after AVR. Independent risk factors of 6-month mortality were patients older than 84 years (odds ratio (OR): 2.2 (1.29-3.61)), left ventricular ejection fraction <60% (OR: 2.5 (1.35-4.61)), body mass index (BMI) <24 (OR: 2.0 (1.22-3.36)), creatinine (OR: 1.6 (1.04-2.53)) and blood glucose (OR: 1.01 (1.001-1.009)). High-risk groups were patients older than 84 years with an ejection fraction <60% (6-month mortality 28%) and patients younger than 84 years with an ejection fraction <60% and a BMI <24 (6-month mortality 23.2%). These high-risk groups comprised 37% of the patient population. After isolated AVR, the 30-day mortality and survival at 1 and 5 years was 11.6%, 69% and 35% in this high-risk group, respectively. In octogenarians with an STS score >10 and an EuroScore >20, the 30-day mortality and survival at 1 year was 10.5% and 80%, 11.6% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In most octogenarians, AVR is a safe and beneficial procedure. In high-risk octogenarians, identified by STS score >10, EuroScore >20 and by simple three risk factors (age >84 years, ejection fraction <60% and BMI <24), the mortality after surgical AVR was no different from the currently reported outcome after transcatheter AVI.

Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch estimated by echocardiographic-determined effective orifice area on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement estimated by various variables such as projected indexed effective orifice area and internal geometric orifice area obtained from in vivo or in vitro published data is still controversial. METHODS: The effective orifice area was measured by echocardiography in 533 patients. The mean age of the patients was 71 +/- 9 years; mean follow-up time was 4.7 +/- 2.2 years. The impact of severe (indexed effective orifice area

The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: The steadily increasing life expectancy of the population in the Western World, together with the progress in noninvasive diagnostic methods and operating techniques lead to an increase in aortic valve surgery in elderly people. AIM OF THE STUDY: Is there an increased risk of adverse perioperative and mid-term outcome for octogenarians and do they benefit from aortic valve replacement (AVR) with stentless bioprostheses? METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, 503 patients older than 60 years underwent AVR with a stentless Freestyle bioprosthesis. Seventy-six of them were older than 80 years. The risk of operative mortality, perioperative complications, valve-related morbidity for octogenarians was determined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: In general, risk-adjusted analyses did not reveal an increased risk of operative mortality (p = 0.4), postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.2), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.5), prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (p = 0.3), or mid-term valve-related morbidity as prosthetic valve endocarditis (p = 0.2), reoperation (p = 0.4), bleeding events (p = 0.1), and stroke (p = 0.8) for octogenarians. Continuously increasing age was an independent risk factor for postoperative neurological complications (OR = 1.8 per 10 years, p = 0.04). Quality of life was equal to or better than the general population of the same age. Median survival time of octogenarians was 5.2 +/- 0.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Except for postoperative neurological complications, octogenarians receiving stentless bioprostheses had no increased risk of adverse perioperative and mid-term outcome in comparison to younger patients. As quality of life and life expectancy after AVR with stentless valves were equal to the general population, AVR with stentless bioprostheses should not be withheld from octogenarians.

Intraoperative transit time flow measurement: off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has attracted increasing attention. Performing the anastomosis off-pump is technically more demanding. The objective of the study is to assess the quality of anastomosis in OPCAB in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using the transit time flow measurement. METHODS: Four hundred forty-five patients operated on using OPCAB technique were included in the study. For each patient in this group a similar patient from the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting population was selected according to the number of grafts, bypass material, and target coronary arteries. The mean flow and the pulsatile index were measured in every bypass graft in both groups. RESULTS: The average pulsatile index in OPCAB was 2.09 +/- 1.03 (mean flow, 39 +/- 22.63 mL/min), whereas with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting it was 1.9 +/- 0.98 (mean flow, 44.19 +/- 23.58 mL/min); p = 0.005. Subgroup analysis showed significantly lower mean flows and higher pulsatile index with OPCAB in grafts to the obtuse marginal, diagonal, and right coronary artery, but not to the left anterior descending territory. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the anastomosis performed using the OPCAB technique might be jeopardized by less accessibility as in the case of lateral and posterior wall coronary arteries. Techniques to optimize the accessibility of the coronary artery like combining sling support with cup stabilizers, together with systematic training, should be strongly considered in OPCAB. Whenever there is good accessibility of the coronary artery as in the case of the left anterior descending, the anastomosis performed under OPCAB has a quality as good as that performed using the conventional technique.

Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although stentless bioprostheses offer hemodynamic advantages, prosthetic valves of smaller size may provide less reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy and, therefore, affect survival and quality of life. METHODS: A total of 303 patients (mean age 75 +/- 7 years) who underwent aortic valve replacement with the stentless Freestyle bioprostheses were followed up. The impact of projected indexed effective orifice area (IEOA) on survival and quality of life (QoL) was determined multivariately by Cox regression and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Independent predictors of survival time were diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.004), male gender (p = 0.015), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.039), and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM, defined as projected IEOA < 0.75 cm2/m2) in patients with aortic regurgitation (p = 0.017). A history of congestive heart failure (p = 0.016), small body mass index (p = 0.01), age > 75 years (p = 0.002) and small projected IEOA (p = 0.016) were identified as predictors of impaired QoL. CONCLUSION: PPM and small projected IEOA were identified as independent risk factors for impaired mid-term survival and QoL. As the occurrence of PPM was rare in total root replacements, and the implantation procedure did not increase the operative risk in the present patient population, the recommendation is made to consider this implantation technique if a small projected IEOA is expected.

Risk in elderly patients after stentless versus stented aortic valve surgery.

Recent studies suggest that the hemodynamic advantage of stentless bioprostheses over the stented type improves long-term survival after aortic valve replacement, but the more complex and time-consuming implantation technique may increase the risks of operative death and postoperative complications. Between April 1996 and June 2001, 519 patients with a mean age of 76 +/- 5 years underwent aortic valve replacement using a stentless (Medtronic Freestyle, n = 277) or stented bioprosthesis (Medtronic Mosaic, n = 242). Multiple logistic regression analysis considering different patient populations revealed no increased risk of operative death, postoperative complications, or neurological impairment after implantation of a stentless bioprosthesis. Survival curves in respect of 367 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement up to September 2000 and were followed up for 3 years were not different (p = 0.98). As the patients were elderly, improved survival due to implantation of a stentless valve could not be demonstrated within this time span.